Book Review: Afterworlds by Scott Westerfeld

18367581Title: Afterworlds

Author: Scott Westerfeld

Format/Length: Paperback/600 pages

Publisher/Date Published: July 29th 2014/Penguin Teen

Category/Genre: Young Adult/Realistic Fiction-Paranormal

Source: Library

Goodreads Amazon Bookworld

Description: Darcy Patel has put college and everything else on hold to publish her teen novel, Afterworlds. Arriving in New York with no apartment or friends she wonders whether she’s made the right decision until she falls in with a crowd of other seasoned and fledgling writers who take her under their wings…

Told in alternating chapters is Darcy’s novel, a suspenseful thriller about Lizzie, a teen who slips into the ‘Afterworld’ to survive a terrorist attack. But the Afterworld is a place between the living and the dead and as Lizzie drifts between our world and that of the Afterworld, she discovers that many unsolved – and terrifying – stories need to be reconciled. And when a new threat resurfaces, Lizzie learns her special gifts may not be enough to protect those she loves and cares about most.

2/5 stars –

★★☆☆☆

Okay, okay, so I know you’re wondering how a book can simultaneously be realistic fiction and paranormal, so here’s my answer: This novel, Afterworlds, is literally a novel inside of another novel. It’s about eighteen-year-old Darcy, who is about to publish her debut novel, Afterworlds. And I have to say—this is one of the most unique concepts I’ve read about in a YA novel, that’s for sure. I’ve noticed that it’s divided readers so far: people either like, or they don’t. After finishing the novel I’m still not one-hundred percent sure where I stand.

On the one hand, I loved it. On the other hand, I’m not sure what feel for it.

So it makes writing this review rather difficult, as you can probably see by now. What I loved so much about this novel — and consequently, why I gave it the three star rating — was the concept, and the writing. The concept, as I’ve discussed above, was fantastically original. I wish there were more YA books that weren’t afraid to step right outside the box instead of falling into the usual YA tropes that we’re all quite sick of nowadays. In terms of prose, I loved the author’s writing style — it was simple but also descriptive in all the right places, and I just loved it. I’d definitely read another of his books again.

I also enjoyed the inclusion of Hindu mythology — that was awesome. I don’t think I’ve ever read another YA book like that before.

adam levine animated GIF

So what didn’t I like about this?

Our two main characters — Darcy and Lizzie, (Darcy is the fictional author of Afterworlds; Lizzie is the main character in Darcy’s story Afterworlds) were fairly good characters, but I have to admit that I connected to Darcy better. Because like her, I’m a writer, and I would totally be lost and nervous when faced with the publishing industry, as she was at the beginning. But Lizzie? I don’t know, to be honest there wasn’t all that much to her. I didn’t connect to her as I did with Darcy; though, ironically, I probably preferred reading Lizzie’s point of view. Not much happened with Darcy. With her, it was more of a coming-of-age, finding-your-place-in-society sort of story, where as Afterworlds was filled with ghosty awesomeness. In saying this, though, I did enjoy reading from the perspective of a writer. That was great — and informative.

This novel alternates between Darcy’s personal story, and Darcy’s fictional story.

I found it hard to really get into either of their story. Here’s why: Because of the alternating between stories in each chapter, I felt thrown around and became quite jarring to read about Lizzie’s paranormal life, and the be thrown right back into Darcy’s. Therefore, it was hard for me to get a proper grasp on each story as they switched so often. I also wondered what the point was, too, of having Lizzie’s story thrown in there — what purpose did it serve?

pointless animated GIF

However, this is still a good novel. I enjoyed it.

To end this review, let me just say this: Don’t let the 600-page scariness of the book make you apprehensive about it. I thought it was the perfect length.

Have you read Afterworlds? What did you think of it? Also: Should I read the author’s other books? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Book Review: Afterworlds by Scott Westerfeld

  1. I’ve been ooohing and aaahing this one for a while but have never taken the leap. I keep picking it up and putting it down. I think I may put it on the back bench for now, just because I don’t think in the mood for dual POVs, let alone ones that run on different story lines right now, you know? I’m glad it was interesting but it’s sad that the tales were a little jarring. Fantastic review! x

  2. I don’t know what it was about this book, but I just really loved it. It was so clever with the satire and everything. But I guess for a lot of people it’s a bit TOO unique :P that’s what happens with experimentation – some people love it, some people hate it. I’ve read the first two books in the Uglies series, but I didn’t like them that much.

  3. I’ve seen a LOT of people love it, so I’m definitely curious. And I love books about writers….it’s like writer inception. BUT HOLY ALPHABET IT IS REALLY BIG. That scares me, quite a lot….and I do worry about being jerked from storyline to story. I still am going to try it, but it might be a library job. ;)

  4. I’ve read some good reviews, and some bad, so I’m definitely intrigued to read this book and find out for myself. It sounds really interesting, however I’ve read the Uglies series (I’ll be honest though, I skimped on the last two- skimming them), and I liked the idea, but thought the characters were really flat, and I didn’t like the writing. Hehe, it is quite a long book, so it could be a while until I read it. (If I end up doing so.) :)

  5. Yeah, I definitely get where you’re coming from and as I was reading the alternating view points, I kept thinking it would be jarring, but I really enjoyed it. I think the actual IDEA was awesome – the book inside the book thing! It was pretty outside the box, and I guess that’s the thing with that: some people will love it, some people will not.

  6. I felt a lot more connected to Darcy than Lizzie too. In many ways there were times where I wanted to skip Lizzie’s chapters to get back to Darcy but I was good and read them in order. I can see why you felt how you did about Afterworlds. IT is a different concept.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s